1RMMaxRep

Brzycki Formula

A precise one rep max formula tuned for sets of 10 reps or fewer.

The equation

1RM = weight × 36 ÷ (37 − reps)

Worked example

Say you squat 140 kg for 5 reps. Plugging into the formula:

1RM = 140 × 36 ÷ (37 − 5)
1RM = 140 × 36 ÷ 32
1RM ≈ 157.5 kg

Strengths and limits

Brzycki is one of the most precise formulas for low-to-moderate rep sets, which is why it's a default in many strength calculators. Its main weakness is at high rep counts — as reps approach 37, the formula mathematically breaks down. Stick to sets of 10 reps or fewer for a trustworthy estimate.

Try it yourself

Enter your lift

Units

Your estimated one rep max

Squat · estimated 1RM

112.5 kg

Raw estimate: 112.5 kg · 248.0 lb

Epley

116.7 kg

Brzycki

112.5 kg

Lombardi

117.5 kg

Training percentages

%WeightReps
100%112.5 kg1 rep
95%106.9 kg1-2 reps
90%101.3 kg2-3 reps
85%95.6 kg3-5 reps
80%90.0 kg4-6 reps
75%84.4 kg6-8 reps
70%78.8 kg8-10 reps
65%73.1 kg10-12 reps
60%67.5 kg12-15 reps
50%56.3 kg15-20 reps
40%45.0 kg20+ reps
Estimated weight for 1–12 reps

1 rep

112.5 kg

2 reps

105.5 kg

3 reps

102.3 kg

4 reps

99.3 kg

5 reps

96.4 kg

6 reps

93.8 kg

7 reps

91.2 kg

8 reps

88.8 kg

9 reps

86.5 kg

10 reps

84.4 kg

11 reps

82.3 kg

12 reps

80.4 kg

Brzycki formula FAQ

Who created the Brzycki formula?+

Strength and conditioning expert Matt Brzycki published this formula, which became popular through fitness textbooks and NSCA-affiliated coaching materials.

Why does Brzycki break down above 10 reps?+

The formula divides by (37 − reps). As reps approach 37, the denominator approaches zero and the estimate grows without bound — so results above roughly 10-12 reps become unreliable.

Is Brzycki more accurate than Epley?+

For sets under 10 reps the two formulas are very close. Brzycki is often considered slightly more precise in the 1-10 rep range, while Epley is simpler and holds up a bit better outside that window. We average both by default to reduce either formula's individual bias.

Compare it directly with the Epley formula or see a full formula comparison.